Bulletin Board - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
To avoid losing or corrupting your comments:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments, take a note of where you up to and return later to make a further submission.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
-
If you would like a copy of the comments you made via the Bulletin Board, please email policy@latrobe.edu.au and specify which document you provided feedback on and a copy of your submission will be emailed to you.
(1) This Procedure establishes the authority, roles and responsibilities for the conduct and management of examinations for coursework subjects. (2) This Procedure applies to examinations in non-thesis coursework subjects regardless of study mode or location. (3) An examination is a type of Supervised Assessment and may be onsite or online. While an examination may be conducted by Academic Services (Central Examination), a La Trobe school or a third-party teaching partner, by definition all examinations must: (4) The following assessment activities are not included in the scope of this Procedure: (5) For provisions in relation to Supplementary and Alternative examinations see Assessment Procedure - Adjustments to Assessment (incorporating Special Consideration). (6) This Procedure forms part of the Assessment Policy suite which governs its application. (7) Assessment activities in subjects are classified by type in the University’s course database when new subjects are proposed or existing subjects are amended. The examinations governed by this Procedure are classified into three sub-types: (8) Other categories (such as Test, Practical Demonstration etc) in the course database must be selected for assessment activities that do not meet the definition of an examination. (9) The determination of whether an assessment activity is appropriately classified as an examination must be made by the Subject Coordinator in accordance with guidelines approved by the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching). (10) The organisers responsible for the scheduling, conduct and coordination of supervision of examinations are as follows: (11) Students with a medical condition, including a mental health condition or a disability, may be eligible to have Reasonable Adjustments (RAs) applied to their arrangements for any required examination. RAs must be documented in a Learning Access Plan (LAP) by an advisor within Accessibility Services. (12) LAPs, or changes to existing LAPs, must be completed by the following deadlines in order for RAs to be provided for examinations: (13) Academic Services, in collaboration with staff from Accessibility Services, is responsible for arranging RAs for Central Examinations, including requirements for specific scheduling, booking of isolation rooms, or additional printing. Subject Coordinators are required to assist where an RA includes an alternative assessment mode or instrument. (14) The responsibility for arranging RAs for other examinations is as follows: (15) The format of an examination is determined by the Subject Coordinator, for all examinations conducted by La Trobe, or by the Partner as appropriate. The following protocols apply: (16) When the format of an examination has been determined all students must undertake the examination in that format, with the exception of students with a LAP that includes relevant RAs. (17) Academic Services is responsible for producing and publishing the timetables for main and Supplementary Examination periods for Central and Scheduled-Only Examinations in accordance with scheduling requirements submitted by schools. (18) Under third-party teaching arrangements, delivery partners are responsible for: (19) Examinations for subjects with high enrolment numbers, excluding those which consist entirely of multiple-choice questions, are scheduled early in the FAP where possible to enable marking to be completed by the official date for release of results. (20) A student may have a maximum of two examinations scheduled for the same day. (21) When Academic Services (or a Partner as appropriate) becomes aware of a clash of examination schedules for individual students, they will notify students of the required arrangements and alternative examination times by e-mail and SMS, giving as much notice as possible and, in the case of a major change (e.g., day, time, length), at least five (5) business days in advance. (22) Reading time is allowed for at the start of the majority of onsite examinations and is either 15 minutes or 30 minutes in duration, depending on the nature of the examination. (23) If reading time is required for an online examination Subject Coordinators (or a Partner as appropriate) must extend the total duration of the examination by the required time. (24) The times listed on the examination timetable will be displayed in 24-hour clock format and denote: (25) General information about examinations for each subject is published in the relevant Subject Learning Guide on the LMS before the commencement of the relevant teaching period. Specific examination arrangements are published prior to the FAP in the Examination Timetable or in the LMS as appropriate. (26) The Subject Coordinator or nominee must prepare two (2) examinations for each examination which includes a main examination and a Special/Supplementary examination, except in the following circumstances: (27) All examinations for Central Examinations (onsite and online) must be submitted to Academic Services by the respective nominated deadlines. Schools are responsible for creating online examinations in the LMS and undertaking all required preparations in advance of the scheduled date, including access arrangements. (28) Where an examination is not submitted by the due date, the examination will be withdrawn from the central Examination Timetable and the relevant school must then manage the examination administration and communications to students. (29) The responsibility for the preparation of other examinations lies with the school or Partner. (30) Where any students sitting an alternative examination with a Partner are subsequently awarded an SPE grade (see Assessment Schedule - Grades and Administrative Codes), the Subject Coordinator must provide a new examination for the Special/Supplementary examination period. (31) Staff involved with any aspect of the examination process must observe the following protocols: (32) Papers for onsite examinations must be securely stored whether by Academic Services, schools or Partners. This requires: (33) Where examination papers for onsite Central Examinations are dispatched to regional campuses or sites there must be: (34) A collection officer must be named and authorised to collect examination material for specified subjects. (35) Authorised collection officers will use suitable identification, such as a University Staff Card, before counting and signing for the number of secure packages and examination paper answer booklets. (36) Examination papers, materials and examination paper answer booklets will only be released to authorised collection officers. (37) The responsibility for all aspects of the distribution of examination papers and associated materials for other examinations lies with the school or Partner as appropriate. (38) LTU Academic Program Directors are responsible for periodic audit checks on Partner examination storage facilities, and on the access rights applied to storage facilities and examination venues, to ensure adherence to these Procedures. (39) Schools and partners are responsible for ensuring the timely release of online examinations via the LMS to ensure appropriate security. (40) Where a staff member of the University or an authorised supervisor/proctor has reason to believe that the security or academic integrity of an examination paper has been compromised, the matter must be reported to the Manager, Academic Services either directly (online examinations) or via the Session Report (onsite examinations). (41) If a security breach has been identified and the examination has not yet taken place, Academic Services or the authorised supervisor may request a replacement examination be issued by the Subject Coordinator, taking into account: (42) Depending on the nature of the breach, it may be appropriate to replace the paper only at certain locations in which case the Subject Coordinator must carefully monitor comparability in difficulty and student performance. (43) If a security breach has been identified and the examination has already taken place with no replacement paper issued: (44) When a security breach has been identified Academic Services will advise students of any change to or delay in finalising examination assessment, and the details of any alternate or additional assessment that may be required. (45) When any alternate or additional assessment has been completed, students must check their results via StudentOnline. (46) Any breach of examination security or any act that jeopardises the integrity of examinations will be dealt with under the relevant University legislation, policies and procedures for staff or student misconduct and discipline. (47) The responsibility for managing breaches of security in school- and Partner-run examinations lies with the respective parties. (48) Academic staff or current students are not permitted to be examination supervisors or Chief Examination Supervisors for Central Examinations. (49) Subject Coordinators and an additional academic, nominated by the Subject Coordinator in the event the Subject Coordinator cannot be reached, must be available by phone for the duration of the examination. (50) Examination supervisors and proctors will perform the following checks prior to students undertaking their examination: (51) In addition to these Procedures, examination supervisors must comply with rules detailed in the Examination Invigilator Manual. (52) An examination supervisor is normally appointed for every 50 candidates at an examination venue. (53) One Chief Examination Supervisor, who is responsible for the set up and administration of the examination(s) within the venue, is assigned per examination venue. (54) All Central Examinations conducted online are supervised by an external proctoring service contracted by the University. External proctoring services are required to comply with this Policy as part of the terms of their contract with the University. (55) The ratio of examination supervisors or proctors per group of examination candidates by type of examination is determined by Academic Services, depending on the assessment of the level of risk presented by the type of examination. This ratio is validated by Education Committee. (56) The responsibility for arranging supervision for Scheduled-Only and Partner examinations lies with the respective parties. (57) Students who require a break during an examination do not receive any additional time for their examination. Absences are recorded as follows: (58) Students who experience technical difficulties during an online examination should contact Student IT Support. (59) Students who find they are unable to proceed with an examination in any mode due to technical difficulties, or other disruptions outside their control such as illness, will need to provide evidence of such when they apply for Special Consideration (see section on Student Responsibilities in this procedure and the Assessment Procedure - Adjustments to Assessment (incorporating Special Consideration). (60) Where minor errors are discovered in examination papers during reading time the error is noted and students are advised to answer the relevant questions to the best of their ability. Where major issues are discovered, Academic Services will contact the relevant Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) to determine whether to proceed with the examination, or whether the examination needs to cease and be rescheduled. Following approval from the Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) or their nominee, Academic Services will ensure the outcome is communicated to other venues and campuses where the same examination is being held. (61) If an on-site examination is disrupted for 30 minutes or more, the Chief Examination Supervisor and Manager, Academic Services will determine whether the examination may be: (62) If the start time of an onsite examination is delayed for up to 30 minutes, the concluding time of the examination may only be extended by the amount of the delay. (63) Where errors are discovered in online examinations, or the examination is disrupted for 30 minutes or more, the external proctor will advise Academic Services who will liaise with the relevant Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) or their nominee to determine the best course of action. Depending on the circumstances this may include rescheduling the examination, extending the duration of the examination by an appropriate time, or organising a Supplementary Examination for an affected cohort. (64) Online examinations that are unable to be conducted at the scheduled time due to a major disruption or outage are rescheduled to a later date. (65) Where it is determined that an online examination is to be rescheduled, Academic Services will ensure that students are notified via email and/or SMS regarding the new arrangements within 24 hours through the Student Communications Team. Where an examination is to be extended proctors will advise students during the examination. (66) The responsibility for managing disruptions during Scheduled-Only and Partner examinations lies with the respective parties. (67) Examination Supervisors will give a time warning 15 minutes before the end of the examination. (68) Only authorised staff are permitted to remove examination papers, materials, and answer booklets from the examination venue. (69) All unused examination papers are to remain in secure storage in accordance with the Records Management Policy. (70) Students undertaking an online examination must refer to the countdown timer in the LMS for the remaining time for the examination. (71) The responsibility for managing the conclusion of Scheduled-Only and Partner examinations lies with the respective parties. (72) Information about examination arrangements will not be given over the phone by Academic Services or ASK La Trobe. Students are responsible for: (73) Students must be available for the entire duration of official examination periods, including Supplementary Hurdle and Special Examination periods. (74) Students are expected to: (75) For an examination conducted online, students are required to: (76) The responsibility for informing students of their responsibilities for Scheduled-Only and Partner examinations lies with the respective parties. (77) Academic Misconduct is defined in the Academic Integrity Statute 2015 and further outlined in the Student Academic Misconduct Policy. In addition to other forms of academic misconduct that may take place in an examination it is considered an act of academic misconduct to have, access or use any material, computer program or item not allowed under the instructions for that examination, whether or not it is with the intention of using it to gain an advantage. (78) Examination Supervisors will confiscate or record evidence of any unauthorised materials being used in an examination or any article which the Supervisor reasonably believes is evidence of academic misconduct. (79) When items are confiscated the Chief Examination Supervisor will return the items to the student at the end of the exam, unless an item is considered relevant to academic or general misconduct proceedings, in which case the item may be kept until investigations have concluded. (80) When academic misconduct is suspected, an Examination Supervisor: (81) Incidents of alleged academic misconduct will be referred by the Chief Examination Supervisor and/or the Manager, Academic Services for further action in accordance with the Student Academic Misconduct Policy. (82) Proctors may contact students via a chat facility during the examination to establish the facts around an exhibited behaviour or use of unauthorised materials/resources. (83) Proctors will record and flag evidence of any unauthorised materials being used in an examination or any article which the supervisor reasonably believes is evidence of academic misconduct, as well as behaviours that are contrary to instructions provided to students. (84) Allegations of academic misconduct in Scheduled-Only examinations are reported directly to the Academic Integrity Unit, for investigation in accordance with the Student Academic Misconduct Policy. (85) The responsibility for managing academic misconduct during partner-run examinations lies with the Partner. (86) Examinations must be quality-assured for both content and non-content aspects. (87) Non-content quality assurance includes cross referencing the publication of and access to allowable materials, and, where relevant, confirming the correct number of pages and that the print quality is acceptable, including that of specialised fonts. This is the responsibility of: (88) Schools and Partners are responsible for ensuring: (89) Any proposed changes to examinations following quality assurance by relevant staff, other than formatting changes, must be authorised by the Dean or their nominee, or their equivalent in the Partner organisation. (90) Assessment records must be retained according to the University’s Records Management Policy and relevant state legislation. In relation to examinations this means that: (91) All students are recorded throughout the onboarding process and for the duration of their online supervised examination. (92) Recordings and personal information captured for the purpose of supervision of an online examination are stored securely by the contracted proctoring service for three (3) months and are then archived. Recordings are held securely on La Trobe University servers for up to two (2) years. (93) Recordings (including on the LMS) may only be accessed by authorised La Trobe staff for the purposes of investigating potential breaches of academic integrity or for records management. (94) Students who are dissatisfied with the application of any part of this Procedure should raise their concerns in the first instance through ASK La Trobe. Students who still have concerns after an initial review may lodge a complaint under the provisions of the Student Complaints Management Policy. (95) For the purpose of this Procedure: (96) This Procedure is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009. (97) Associated information includes:Assessment Procedure - Examinations
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Review Date
Insert review date
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Approve changes to examinations following quality assurance
Dean or nominee
Decision whether to proceed with an examination where major errors are discovered during reading time
Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching)
Determine appropriate action following a disruption to an onsite examination in progress
Manager, Academic Services
Determine appropriate action following a disruption to an online examination in progress
Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching
Determine appropriate action following a security breach in an examination
Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching)
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Classification of Assessment Types
Part B - Overview of Responsibilities
Examination Sub-Type
Format
Responsibility for Scheduling
Responsibility for Conduct
Responsibility for Coordinating Supervision*
Central Examination
Onsite/Online
Academic Services
Academic Services
Academic Services
Scheduled-Only Examination
Onsite/Online
Academic Services
Partner Examination
Onsite/Online
Partner
Partner
Partner
Part C - Reasonable Adjustments
Central Examinations
Other Examinations
Part D - Format of Examinations
Part E - Scheduling and Publication
Central and Scheduled-Only Examinations
Partner Examinations
Considerations in Scheduling – All Examinations
Reading Time
Information to Students
Part F - Examination Preparation
Central Examinations
Other Examinations
Part G - Security of Examination Instruments
Onsite Examinations
Central Examinations – Onsite
Other Examinations – Onsite
All Online Examinations
Part H - Breaches of Security
Central Examinations
Other Examinations
Part I - Responsibilities of Examination Supervisors and Academic Supports
All Central Examinations
Onsite Central Examinations
Online Central Examinations
Other Examinations
Part J - Disruptions to Examinations
Individual Students in Central Examinations
Broader Disruptions to Central Examinations
Onsite Examinations
Online Examinations
Other Examinations
Part K - Concluding Examinations
Central Examinations – Onsite
Central Examinations – Online
Other Examinations
Part L - Student Responsibilities
Central Examinations
Other Examinations
Part M - Academic Misconduct
Central Examinations
Onsite Examinations
Online Examinations
Scheduled-Only Examinations
Partner Examinations
Part N - Quality Assurance of Examinations
Part O - Retention of Examination and Related Material
Examination Material
Recordings and Personal Information – Online Proctored Examinations
Part P - Review
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 8 - Authority and Associated Information