Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This Procedure outlines the ways in which the University ensures that academic staff at each level of teaching are conducting and participating in appropriate scholarly activity in accordance with the Higher Education Standards (2021). (2) This Procedure applies to all staff who teach students enrolled in La Trobe award courses, with the exception of casual staff. This includes staff teaching in La Trobe courses taught under educational partnership agreements. For the purposes of this Procedure staff in the following roles are hereafter referred to as ‘teaching staff’: (3) This Procedure does not apply to research-only staff. Refer to the suite of policies applying to research in the Policy Library for the University’s support for, and requirements of, research-only staff. (4) This Procedure is part of the Academic Staff Qualifications Policy which governs its application. (5) Academic scholarship is academic activity that: (6) Individual members of teaching staff are responsible for planning for, undertaking, and maintaining evidence of their scholarly activities in collaboration with their supervisor and the academic leadership of their school. (7) The University allocates dedicated time for staff to engage in research and scholarly activities as part of their workload through its Enterprise Agreement. (8) The University has a responsibility to: (9) Teaching staff should be actively engaged in academic scholarship that: (10) The expectations for the level of engagement in academic scholarship, and the types of activities undertaken, will vary according to the level of appointment of individual academic staff, as outlined in the Academic Performance Framework and associated guidelines. (11) Teaching staff may demonstrate the maintenance and advancement of disciplinary knowledge as follows: (12) Required scholarly activity can include, but is not limited to, the following: (13) Graduate research students appointed to fixed term or ongoing teaching roles are deemed as meeting the requirement of maintaining contemporary disciplinary knowledge so long as they: (14) Professional development in learning and teaching practice is required of all teaching staff within the scope of this Procedure, and may be achieved through both formal and informal activities including, but not limited to engagement or enrolment in: (15) In accordance with the Higher Education Standards Guidance Note, SoLT is not: (16) Teaching staff are required to develop and regularly update their academic, professional and personal goals in consultation with their supervisors through the University’s annual performance lifecycle. (17) Individual plans should include specific goals and activities related to academic scholarship as outlined in Part B of this Procedure. (18) Subject and Course Coordinators have specific responsibilities to encourage and facilitate professional development opportunities for the teaching team responsible for delivery of subjects within a course to ensure that staff remain up to date with disciplinary knowledge, educational technology, and best practices in teaching and assessment (see Subject and Course Coordinator Role Descriptions). (19) The University promotes academic scholarship through a range of professional development activities and provides other support for academic staff through People & Culture, Education Services, individual schools and the La Trobe Academy. (20) In partnership with the Office of the Provost and schools, the La Trobe Academy (the Academy) systematically supports the scholarship of learning and teaching through undertaking or facilitating the following activities: (21) The University recognises achievements in academic scholarship through awards, promotions, and other incentives. Staff are supported to apply for internal and external awards (see Education Awards [staff link only]). (22) Staff are encouraged to publish their research, present at conferences, and contribute to academic committees. (23) The University also supports academic scholarship through the provision of internal funding and grants and opportunities for OSP that may be applied to both the enhancement of disciplinary knowledge and SoLT. (24) The University ensures that staff have access to research databases, academic journals, and other resources necessary for scholarly work (see Library and Digital Learning Resources Policy). (25) Results of scholarly activity may be published and peer reviewed, internally or externally, as appropriate. (26) Supervisors assess staff achievements in scholarly activities as part of the annual performance lifecycle. (27) The La Trobe Academy is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of their professional development support for academic scholarship through feedback from staff, and the analysis of performance outcomes. (28) Staff can provide feedback on the support and resources available for academic scholarship through formal staff surveys such as the Employee Experience Survey. (29) Teaching staff are required to report on the scholarly activity they plan to take or have undertaken through the annual performance lifecycle. (30) The Academic Director of the La Trobe Academy provides detailed briefings and reports on the Academy’s activities to the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching), the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), the Senior Executive Group and Academic Board as required. (31) The Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) provides annual reports on academic scholarly activity to Education Committee for monitoring purposes. (32) Documentation related to staff engagement in academic scholarship, performance reviews, and funding applications, is handled confidentially and accordance with University policies, including the Privacy Policy. (33) For the purposes of this Procedure: (34) This Procedure is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009.Academic Staff Qualifications Procedure - Scholarship
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Review Date
29 April 2028
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Assessment of staff scholarly activities
Academic supervisors
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Overview
Part B - Academic Scholarship Requirements
Disciplinary Knowledge
Scholarship of Learning and Teaching
Part C - Planning for and Supporting Scholarship
Individual Goal Setting
School Leadership
Institutional Support
The La Trobe Academy
Recognition and Incentives
Funding
Access to Resources
Part D - Outcomes and Review of Individual Scholarship
Part E - Evaluation of Academic Scholarship Programs
Part F - Reporting
Part G - Record Keeping and Confidentiality
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 8 - Authority and Associated Information