Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) The University recognises the importance of attracting and retaining high calibre staff that enhance the quality and reputation of the University and are also aligned to the University’s strategic vision. (2) The University is also committed to ensuring that the process of appointing such staff is transparent, equitable and compliant with the University’s modes of employment and classification standards. (3) This Policy sets out the requirements, roles and responsibilities of staff nominated to Selection Committees of the University. (4) This Policy applies to recruitment processes for the following classifications: (5) This Policy provides for the types of appointments that can exist within the University for academic and professional appointments, and the entitlements, rights, obligations and restrictions on those appointments. (6) Refer to the Recruitment Policy and Conflict of Interest Policy. (7) The role of the Selection Committee is to ensure that University appointments are made on merit and meet legislative requirements for equal employment opportunity. (8) The composition of selection committees must be appropriate to be able to assess the suitability of candidates for the position being filled. (9) It is recommended that the Selection Committee be established by the Hiring Manager/Chair prior to advertising the position. It is recommended the Selection Committee comprises of two (2) to five (5) members of staff. The more senior the role, the higher the number of personnel on the Selection Committee. (10) The selected Selection Committee members should remain the same throughout the recruitment process of each position to ensure consistency in the selection process and assessment. (11) Where appropriate or desirable, the Hiring Manager/Chairperson may appoint a specialist external advisor to the Selection Committee to provide an assessment of candidates in relation to the specific academic/professional field. (12) Any additional nominees to, or delegation of duties of the Selection Committee, should be discussed with the Talent Acquisition team member at anytime throughout the recruitment process. (13) When considering potential representatives of the Selection Committee, it is recommended that the Hiring Manager consider regional representation for all regional appointments. (14) Hiring Managers are accountable for ensuring appropriate gender representation on the Selection Committee. (15) Selection Committees for all positions allocated for Indigenous staff recruitment, or relating to matters of significant Indigenous content, must include an indigenous representative. (16) For professional staff appointments the composition of the Selection Committee must be: (17) For academic staff appointments the composition of the Selection Committee must be as follows, noting that the Chair must be a minimum of one level above the appointment level: (18) Where a person who is not a current staff member is proposed to be appointed (preferred candidate) to an academic classification higher than their current role via a recruitment process (for example the preferred candidate is currently a Level B academic at University of Y and is the preferred candidate for a Level C appointment at La Trobe University), prior to an offer being made to the preferred candidate: (19) For the purpose of this Policy: (20) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009.Selection Committee Policy
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Administrative – Vice-Chancellor
Accountable Executive – Policy
Chief Operating Officer
Responsible Manager – Policy
Chief People Officer
Review Date
2 July 2028
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Top of PageSection 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Appoint a specialist external advisor to the Selection Committee
Chairperson/Hiring Manager
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Role of the Selection Committee
Composition of the Selection Committee
External academic staff appointments at a higher level than current role
Top of Page
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 8 - Authority and Associated Information