Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This Policy provides the overarching principles by which the University’s coursework subjects and awards are designed and delivered. (2) In addition to aligning with the University’s key teaching and learning frameworks and strategies, this Policy supports the University’s compliance with the Australian Qualifications Framework, the Higher Education Standards Framework (2021), and the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS). (3) This Policy should be read in conjunction with: (5) in addition to external regulatory instruments all subjects and coursework awards of the University are designed to align with the principles and standards outlined in this Policy and: (6) Courses and subjects demonstrate contemporary academic and industry relevance: (7) Courses and subjects are supported by the deployment of appropriately qualified staff (as outlined in the Academic Staff Qualifications Policy) and fit-for-purpose learning environments. Course and subject design is student-centred, inclusive and responsive to diverse learner needs: (8) Curriculum is coherent and fosters a deep approach to learning: (9) Course and subject design are informed by robust review and consultation (as set out in the Course and Subject Management Procedure - Approvals and the Course and Subject Management Procedure - Monitoring and Review). (10) Courses and subjects at La Trobe may be designed for and delivered in a variety of modes (where approved under the Course and Subject Management Procedure - Approvals) as follows (for full descriptions see Definitions section in this Procedure): (11) In order for the University to meet its obligations under ESOS, courses should be designed to ensure that international students can enrol in two thirds of subjects that are delivered face-to-face (see Enrolment Procedure). (12) These standards must be applied across all subjects to create an engaging, inclusive, and innovative learning experience and should follow the Prepare, Engage, and Review phases outlined in the La Trobe Teaching Framework (link to be provided). (13) In designing a subject consideration should be given to the proportion of structured and unstructured learning required of a student. Definitions and examples of structured and unstructured learning are given in Table 1.(These categories cannot be applied to thesis or placement subjects.) (14) Total study hours (structured + unstructured) must not exceed 120 hours for a 15 credit point (CP) subject and should be allocated as follows: (15) Any requirements for a greater proportion of structured hours in a subject due to disciplinary or accreditation requirements should be outlined during the subject approval process but limited wherever possible. (16) For more detail on planning student workload see Teaching Hours Guidance Note (staff only – under review). (17) Subjects will be designed to allow students to navigate content independently with clear, logical structure and sequencing, while incorporating Universal Design principles to ensure accessibility for students with diverse needs. (18) Subjects must include a mix of content formats (e.g., videos, readings, quizzes, and forums) and utilise collaborative and interactive tools to promote active engagement, enrich the learning experience, and build a sense of community. (19) Learning content must include detailed instructions and objectives to guide students through activities and assessments and to support independent learning. (20) To assist students to develop confidence and autonomy as learners subjects will embed opportunities for reflective learning and self-assessment with feedback. (21) Online asynchronous subjects should be separated into modules, topics or sections so students can progress at their own pace while meeting deadlines for assessments. (22) Each content section must include at least one interactive element (e.g., quizzes, polls, discussions, or collaborative tasks) that requires students to actively engage with the material in addition to passive reading or viewing. (23) Subjects will be designed within a single, consistent LMS site, ensuring all students have equitable access to the same learning experience. Separate LMS sites may be established for fully asynchronous instances. (24) Learning resources should be digital and freely accessible wherever possible, with minimal need for physical textbooks or external navigation. (25) Subject information, learning content and resources must be made available in the LMS at least two (2) weeks prior to the commencement of subject delivery. This includes: (26) Links to the following are provided as standard in the University LMS template: (27) Structured learning activities must be designed to incorporate active learning strategies that encourage collaboration, problem-solving, and application of knowledge. (28) Online learning content should be presented in focused and engaging asynchronous formats that are appropriate for the level of the material and intentionally designed to support effective learning. (29) Regular announcements or updates will be used to create a sense of connection and keep students informed. (30) Interactive asynchronous tools, such as discussion forums, reflective journals, and collaborative documents, will be incorporated to support learning and maintain engagement. (31) Scheduled voluntary sessions may be offered at regular intervals throughout the teaching period to clarify information already presented in the LMS or to answer student questions; these sessions must not introduce new content. (32) La Trobe University is committed to promoting steady student progression. Accordingly, the University only supports the imposition of the subject rules listed below where there is a pedagogical reason for their inclusion: (33) Subject rules are set only where there is a compelling pedagogic reason or, in the case of quotas, logistic reasons. Incompatible Subjects, for example, are appropriate only where necessary to prevent students from repeating content already passed; Equivalent Subjects are appropriate where a subject code is replaced by a new subject code. (34) Prerequisites, Corequisites, Incompatible Subjects and quotas are published in the Course Handbook and relevant subject-specific materials. (35) Co- and Prerequisite rules may take any of the following forms: (36) A quota may be placed on a subject only where the subject: (37) Credit awarded in recognition of study outside the University can satisfy a prerequisite. (38) Subject rules may be waived only in exceptional circumstances, normally where it can be demonstrated that the requirements and/or conditions reflected in the rules have been met. (39) Subject rules may be waived by Subject Coordinators. Details of the waiver, including the reasons for it, must be documented and placed on the appropriate student file. Where rules are regularly waived, these will be removed (as outlined in the Course and Subject Management Procedure – Approvals). (40) To ensure the alignment of La Trobe courses with real-world demands and to support graduate employability all courses are designed to meet the Minimum Employability Curriculum Standards outlined in the La Trobe Employability Framework. (41) All courses are designed to scaffold the development of employability capabilities across the length of a course by embedding career-focussed and industry-relevant learning experiences throughout the curriculum. (42) Except where mandated by the requirements of accreditation bodies, all subjects and courses must have Intended Learning Outcomes as follows: (43) These limits also apply to double degrees. CILOs for double degrees must be written specifically for the double degree rather than a merger of CILOs from the component degrees. (44) Graduate Capabilities (GCs) are interdisciplinary skills, knowledge and abilities that equip students to live and work in a rapidly changing and complex world. They are desirable and transferable attributes sought by employers. (45) The GCs encapsulate for both students and the wider community the defining characteristics of a La Trobe graduate and describe a set of characteristics that are designed to be transferable beyond the disciplinary context in which they have been developed. (46) The GCs provide a broad framework and are intended to be interpreted and defined more precisely in the context of each academic discipline or course. (47) The design of courses, learning activities and assessment tasks will ensure that graduates have achieved CILOs that address the La Trobe GCs, in addition to the requirements of the relevant academic discipline or profession, and any professional accreditation requirements. (48) GCs are explicitly and progressively developed through constructive alignment of CILOs, SILOs and associated assessments. (49) Teaching, learning and assessment of the La Trobe GCs is assured through the course and subject approval, monitoring and review processes, and the monitoring of student learning experiences through student feedback mechanisms. (50) This Procedure defines the GCs and who is responsible for their development in courses and subjects. (51) When developing a new course or reviewing an existing course, Course Coordinators should: (52) When developing a new subject or reviewing an existing subject, Subject Coordinators will: (53) The La Trobe Graduate Capabilities are defined as: (54) The overall design of subjects and courses and is approved and reviewed through the processes outlined in the Course and Subject Management Policy. (55) Individual elements of subjects and courses are also monitored and assured through processes outlined in the Assessment Policy and the La Trobe Employability Framework. (56) For the purposes of this Policy: (57) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009. (58) Associated information for this Policy includes:Course Design Policy
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Review Date
29 August 2028
Section 2 - Purpose
Top of PageSection 3 - Scope
Top of PageSection 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Ensure Course Intended Learning Outcomes (CILOs) and Subject Intended Learning Outcomes (SILOs) align with approved La Trobe Graduate Capabilities.
Course Coordinator
Waive Subject Rules in exceptional cases
Subject Coordinators
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Principles
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Course and Subject Delivery Modes
Part B - Subject Standards
Subject Workload - Volume and Type of Learning
Table 1 – Structured and Unstructured Learning
Type of Learning
Descriptor
Structured
Scheduled Learning Activities
Timetabled, synchronous, instructor-led learning sessions that occur at a specific time and location (physical or virtual).
Unscheduled Learning Activities
Structured learning tasks that are not timetabled. These are part of the formal learning design and are typically asynchronous. They may include short videos, interactive modules, required discussion board participation, or formative quizzes.
Unstructured
Self-Directed Study
Self-directed study or learning activities are in addition to the required scheduled or unscheduled learning activities. This includes preparing and completing assessments, reviewing materials, conducting independent reading or research, practicing discipline-specific skills, exploring supplementary resources, and managing study planning and organisation.Design Standards
All Subjects
Additional Requirements for Online Asynchronous Subjects
Delivery Standards
Additional Requirements for Online Asynchronous Subjects
Part C - Subject Rules
Conditions that Justify Quotas
Waiving of Subject Rules
Part D - Employability
Part E - Intended Learning Outcomes
Part F - Graduate Capabilities
Responsibilities for Embedding the Graduate Capabilities
The La Trobe Graduate Capabilities
Part G - Quality Assurance and Review
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 8 - Authority and Associated Information