Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this
to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) These Standards outline the University’s requirements for course and subject design in accordance with the principles detailed in the Course Design Policy and should be read in conjunction with the Assessment Policy and the Assessment Standards. (2) Refer to the Course Design Policy. (3) Refer to the Course Design Policy. (4) Courses and subjects at La Trobe are designed for and delivered in a variety of modes (where approved under the Course and Subject Management Procedure - Approvals) as follows (for full descriptions see Definitions): (5) In order for the University to meet its obligations under Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) Regulations 2001, courses should be designed to ensure that international students can enrol in two thirds of subjects where the primary mode of delivery is face-to-face (see Enrolment Procedure and CRICOS Checklist). (6) In order to promote steady student progression, courses are designed to avoid requirements for the subject rules listed below, unless there is a pedagogical reason for their inclusion: (7) Where corequisite and/or prerequisite rules are necessary, they may take any of the following forms: (8) Where technical or contractual constraints (e.g. specific third party delivery arrangements) present a barrier for the application of any subject rules, equivalent progression controls must be documented and managed through approved partnership or operational arrangements. (9) Graduate Capabilities (GCs) are interdisciplinary skills, knowledge and abilities that equip students to live and work in a rapidly changing and complex world. They are desirable and transferable attributes sought by employers and valued in society. (10) The GCs encapsulate, for both students and the wider community, the defining characteristics of a La Trobe graduate and describe a set of attributes that are designed to be transferable beyond the disciplinary context in which they have been developed. (11) The GCs provide a broad framework and are intended to be interpreted and defined more precisely in the context of each academic discipline or course. (12) The La Trobe Graduate Capabilities are defined as: (13) Intended Learning Outcomes articulate the knowledge and skills that students develop and demonstrate in their course through the learning and teaching activities, and are embedded in the following course components: (14) Intended Learning Outcomes of any course component must scaffold progressive learning and support students to apply the knowledge and skills required for successful completion of the course. (15) Intended Learning Outcomes encompass discipline and generic outcomes, including: (16) Course design must include all course components, assessment, and learning activities required for students to demonstrate the Intended Learning Outcomes specified for the course. (17) Except where mandated by the requirements of accreditation bodies, subjects and courses have minimum and maximum SSILOs, SILOs, MILOs and CILOs as follows: (18) *CILOs for double degrees are written specifically for the double degree rather than a merger of CILOs from the component degrees. The number of CILOs may exceed eight (8) only where required by professional accrediting bodies. (19) In accordance with the La Trobe Employability Framework all courses are designed to scaffold the development of employability capabilities across the length of a course by embedding career-focussed and industry-relevant learning experiences throughout the curriculum. (20) All Bachelor’s and Master’s by coursework awards (excluding nested awards such as Diplomas, Associate Diplomas, Graduate Certificates and Graduate Diplomas) have at least one authentic work-integrated learning (WIL) component, which may be a project or a work-based activity (placement). The La Trobe Employability Framework provides guidance on the design and implementation of WIL experiences. (21) In some courses, a thesis, equivalent portfolio of works, or research project may be recognised as a WIL component where it demonstrably meets the criteria for authentic, externally contextualised learning as set out in the La Trobe Employability Framework. (22) Students’ achievement of CILOs is assured through designated supervised assessment tasks, known as assurance checkpoints (see Definitions and the Assessment Standards). (23) While supervised assessment can occur in any subject, it must be included in capstone subjects and, wherever practicable, in the compulsory WIL component of each course. Where it is not practicable to include supervised assessment in the WIL component of a course (e.g. in some forms of project-based WIL), alternative supervised assurance checkpoints should be identified elsewhere in the course. (24) Capstone subjects require the synthesis and application of knowledge and skills acquired throughout the student’s learning in a course. Capstone subjects: (26) Where capstones are in majors, they map to Major Intended Learning Outcomes (MILOs). (27) Capstone learning and assessment collectively address all Course Intended Learning Outcomes (CILOs). The supervised assurance checkpoint(s) do not need to assess every CILO individually but must be sufficient to assure achievement of the CILOs at the award level. Multiple capstone subjects may be required if all CILOs cannot be addressed in one capstone. (28) Capstone subjects must be a minimum of 15 credit points. The capstone requirements of different awards are as follows: (29) The following awards are exempt from capstone requirements: (30) In all other awards achievement of all CILOs must be assessed through appropriately weighted supervised assessment conducted in the final teaching period(s) of the course (see also Assessment Standards). This includes: (31) Subjects are designed to allow students to navigate content independently with clear, logical structure and sequencing, while incorporating Universal Design principles to ensure accessibility for students with diverse needs. (32) Learning content includes detailed instructions and objectives to guide students through activities and assessments and to support independent learning. (33) Subjects are designed within a single, consistent LMS site, ensuring all students have equitable access to the same learning experience across concurrent instances. Separate LMS sites may be established for asynchronous instances. (34) Learning resources are digital and freely accessible wherever possible, with minimal need for physical textbooks or external navigation. (35) All governed content in the LMS must align with approved data in CourseLoop. (36) Subject information, assessment details, and an overview of weekly learning activities are made available in the LMS at least two (2) weeks prior to the commencement of subject delivery (see also Assessment Standards). (37) Detailed learning materials (e.g. weekly readings and lecture content) may be updated during the teaching period, provided that: (38) Links to the following are provided as standard in the University LMS template: (39) Structured learning activities are designed to incorporate active learning strategies that encourage collaboration, problem-solving, and application of knowledge. (40) Online learning content is presented in focused and engaging asynchronous formats that are appropriate for the level of the material and intentionally designed to support effective learning. (41) An enrolment quota may be placed on a subject only where the subject: (42) In designing a subject, consideration is given to the proportion of guided and self-directed learning required of a student. Definitions and examples of guided and self-directed learning are given in Table 1 (these categories are not applied to placement or thesis subjects [or subjects with an equivalent portfolio of works). (43) Total study hours (guided + self-directed) do not exceed 120 hours for a 15-credit-point (CP) subject and are allocated as follows: (44) Any subject design that exceeds the hours listed above must outline and provide supporting documentation for the relevant disciplinary or accreditation requirements during the subject approval process; however this should be limited wherever possible. (45) For the purposes of these Standards: (46) These Standards are made under the La Trobe University Act 2009. (47) Associated information includes:Course Design Standards
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Review Date
15 April 2029
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
N/A
N/A
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Course and Subject Delivery Modes
Part B - Designing for Course Progression
Part C - Graduate Capabilities
Overview
La Trobe Graduate Capabilities
Part D - Intended Learning Outcomes
Item
Minimum ILO
Maximum ILO
Sub-Subject
1 SSILO
1 SSILO
Subject
3 SILOs
5 SILOs
Major
3 MILOs
5 MILOs
Course of 60 credit points or less
3 CILOs
5 CILOs
All other courses (including double degrees)*
5 CILOs
8 CILOS
Part E - Employability
Part F - Assurance of Learning Outcomes
Capstone Subjects
Capstone Requirements in Courses
General
Credit Point Requirements
Award Level
Award Type
Capstone Minimum Requirements
Undergraduate award of 360 credit points or more (including embedded honours)
No major
15 credit points in course core
Undergraduate award of 360 credit points or more (including embedded honours)
Includes major(s)
15 credit points in each major (capstone/s may also be a course core subject where conditions are met)
Double degree awards
N/A
30 credit points of capstone study in majors or course core subjects, with at least one capstone associated with each component course
Postgraduate award (AQF Level 9)
N/A
15 credit points in course core subjects
Exemptions from Capstone Requirements
Part G - Subject Standards
Design Standards
All Subjects
Delivery Standards
Quotas
Part H - Subject Workload - Volume and Type of Learning
Table 1 – Guided and Self-Directed Learning
Top of PageSection 7 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 8 - Authority and Associated Information