Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) To set out the Policy and Procedures for the award of the title Charles La Trobe Professor. (2) The process will be based on demonstrated academic achievement which supports the University’s strategic goals in teaching and research, and will be conducted in a transparent and equitable manner and with due regard for confidentiality. (4) To recognise academic achievement at the highest level from within the current professoriate, sustained over a period of time at La Trobe University, by the award of the title Charles La Trobe Professor and thereby to support the University’s strategic objectives. (5) Nominees must be currently at professorial level. (6) Professors who have a sustained record of academic achievement at the very highest level at La Trobe and who bring credit to the University and raise the University’s standing nationally and internationally may be nominated for such an award. (8) Evidence of national and international recognition at the highest level could be demonstrated by the following examples: (9) Five (5) years. At the conclusion of this term, the Pro Vice-Chancellor may put forward a case to extend the award for a further term. (10) Nominations may be made at any time by the Pro Vice-Chancellor, or by a Deputy Vice-Chancellor, to the Vice-Chancellor and must include: (11) The committee will make the decision regarding the choice of independent assessors. A list of names will be provided by the Pro Vice-Chancellor/nominator, and the committee may take advice from elsewhere when selecting assessors. (12) Normally, four reports will be obtained from independent assessors. (14) The committee membership must meet the University’s requirements for gender representation. (15) The nominations will be assessed by the committee against the criteria outlined in clauses 8 and 9, above. (16) The committee may elect to invite the nominating Pro Vice-Chancellor/Deputy Vice Chancellor to attend the meeting to speak to the nomination. (17) A decision will be made either to support, or not to support, the nomination. (18) The Vice-Chancellor will have the authority to approve the award of the title Charles La Trobe Professor. (19) If approved, the award will take effect normally from the date of approval by the Vice-Chancellor. (20) Successful nominations will be reported to the Academic Board. (21) A person awarded the title of Charles La Trobe Professor should have the same duties and responsibilities as appointees to professorial positions within the relevant schools. (22) The University reserves the right to withdraw the award in the event that the recipient engages in conduct which might reflect badly on the University. (23) As an award of the title Charles La Trobe Professor is by nomination and not by application, there will be no appeal mechanism for persons whose nominations are unsuccessful. (24) For the purpose of this Policy and Procedure:Awarding of Title - Charles La Trobe Professor Policy
Section 1 - Background and Purpose
Section 2 - Scope
Top of PageSection 3 - Policy Statement
Section 4 - Procedure
Eligibility
Criteria
Term of Award
Submission of Nominations
Assessors
Committee Membership
Consideration of nominations
Approval
Conditions Relating to Award
Right of Appeal
Section 5 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 6 - Stakeholders