Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This Procedure outlines the mechanisms for the establishment, operation and quality assurance of arrangements for a range of formal educational partnerships between the University and third parties. (2) This Procedure applies to categories of formal educational partnerships between La Trobe and third parties, as defined in the Educational Partnerships Policy, including: (3) Requirements for work-based learning arrangements for students are outlined in the Educational Partnerships Procedure - Work-Based Learning. (4) Refer to the Educational Partnerships Policy. (5) Quality and Standards oversees and provides advice on all educational partnership arrangements within the scope of this Procedure. (6) In addition to the requirements outlined in this Procedure, staff are required to follow the detailed steps outlined in the Process Frameworks for each type of educational partnership available via the Third Party Programs and Partnerships intranet page using the relevant forms and templates. (7) All staff involved in third-party arrangements are responsible for notifying the Director, Higher Education Standards Registration where a substantive change is identified to any existing arrangement. Under this Procedure, substantive changes are: (8) In most circumstances where arrangements with a third party involve collaboration across multiple categories of activity, separate agreements must be entered into for activity under each agreement category. (9) In the rare circumstances where different activities are combined, the agreement must include all requirements for each activity represented. (10) Where a proposed arrangement requires other approvals, such as new course approval, an additional course instance approval, or academic approval of the subjects within an articulation arrangement, the responsible staff must initiate these processes concurrently with agreement development, variation or termination and ensure that appropriate approvals are secured. (11) All educational partnership agreements must have a Sponsor at senior executive level. The Sponsor is accountable for all activities in relation to a third-party educational arrangement but normally appoints an appropriately senior member of staff as the nominee to fulfill these functions. The Nominee is the primary point of contact for all significant matters related to the partnership but is responsible for consulting with the Sponsor as appropriate during the development of arrangements. (12) During the initiation phase the Nominee is responsible for: (13) The level of due diligence required for educational partnerships is commensurate with the type of activity proposed. (14) Due diligence must be completed by the nominees and confirmed by Quality and Standards, prior to the development or renewal of all educational partnerships between the University and another organisation. (15) Where the proposed partner is a foreign entity, the Nominee must complete a Foreign Engagement Assessment Tool for consideration by the University’s Foreign Arrangements team. (16) Where substantive risks have been identified as an outcome of due diligence, or at any time during the operation of an agreement, the Nominee is responsible for ensuring a risk management plan is created and confirmed by the La Trobe Risk and Compliance Office and Quality and Standards. (17) Prior to the execution of any formal agreement Nominees are responsible for ensuring: (18) The Finance Division supports the development of the business case and ensures resourcing requirements under the Responsibilities Matrix are accounted for. (19) Agreement terms are normally approved for a period of between one (1) and seven (7) years. Under exceptional circumstances alternate terms may be considered. (20) Legal Services provide Nominees with agreement templates for all standard agreement types that have been approved by Quality and Standards. Quality and Standards provide associated documents for agreement initiation, renewal, variation and closure. (21) Where changes or additions are required to an existing agreement, the Nominee must consult with all relevant stakeholders and the partner to ensure that resourcing and other requirements can continue to be met under the proposed variations and that these are updated in the Responsibilities Matrix. (22) The documentation required to vary an existing agreement will depend on the level of change required: (23) The Nominee will work with Quality and Standards and Legal Services to update relevant documents and to obtain a Letter of Variation or revised agreement. (24) Preparations for the renewal or termination of a partnership agreement should be commenced by the Nominee in consultation with the Sponsor one year in advance of the expiry of the current agreement and must include: (25) Following such review the Nominee commences formal negotiations with the partner and consultations with internal stakeholders for any revisions to the arrangements. (26) In exceptional circumstances existing agreements may be extended by a Letter of Extension for a single period of up to 12 months where the terms of the current agreement meet all the requirements of the Higher Education Standards. (27) Agreements may be terminated under the following circumstances: (28) Initial discussions in relation to terminating an agreement will occur between the Sponsor and partner. (29) The Nominee liaises with Quality and Standards and Legal Services to complete the required documentation where there is a proposal to terminate. (30) Quality and Standards reviews all documentation for new, renewed, or varied agreements and endorses agreements for execution. (31) Following endorsement the Nominee, with the agreement of the Sponsor, arranges for the partner to sign first and then returns the agreement or Letter of Variation to the appropriate Delegated Authority according to the University’s Contract Signing Delegations for final execution. (32) Records of fully executed agreements are maintained and copies submitted to Legal Services and/or Digital Records as required. (33) A signing ceremony may be held for any agreement under this Procedure. (34) Where a ceremony is held and the Delegated Authority is not in attendance, a nominated La Trobe staff member may sign a non-binding Statement of Intent or similarly named document approved by the University General Counsel after the corresponding agreement(s) has been endorsed for execution as outlined in this Procedure. The Statement of Intent can acknowledge the partnership between La Trobe and the third party but must not commit either party to any specific action. (35) The nominee may not under any circumstances sign the formal agreement on behalf of the Delegated Authority. (36) Arrangements for the quality assurance and governance of educational partnerships vary according to the type of activity included in the respective agreements and are outlined in this part. (37) Quality assurance mechanisms for clinical education arrangements vary by activity and are outlined in the relevant Process Framework associated with this Procedure. (38) The University Course Portfolio and Scholarships Committee and Academic Board maintain general oversight of the viability and quality of third party teaching arrangements. (39) Courses and subjects under third party agreements are included in normal course and subject monitoring activities, in addition to the specific quality assurance measures outlined in this Procedure. (40) An Academic Program Director (APD) from each party must be appointed for each course prior to delivery. The APD is responsible for oversight of the day-to-day delivery of a course and escalating issues as necessary to the agreement Nominee, Sponsor or Quality and Standards. (41) A Joint Management Committee (JMC) is convened for each third party teaching partnership under standard Terms of Reference. The JMC is responsible for oversight of the quality and strategic development of courses under the partnership via course and site review reports. Specific quality improvement actions may be required of, or instigated by, the JMC as a result of quality monitoring activities. (42) An Annual Performance Report for each partnership is provided to Academic Board via the Education Committee containing: (43) The Finance Division provides an annual financial performance report for each partnership to the Course Portfolio and Scholarships Committee. (44) Additional thematic or in-depth reviews may be undertaken where issues are identified through normal quality assurance activities, or at the request of University committees. (45) Nominees and Schools undertake monitoring and improvement of articulation arrangements. This includes: (46) The Pro Vice-Chancellor (Educational Partnerships) is responsible for quality monitoring of student mobility arrangements. This involves ongoing review of quality indicators appropriate to each type of mobility arrangement and the conduct of a performance review prior to the renewal of any agreement. (47) The relevant Sponsor is responsible for monitoring compliance with terms of the courseware licensing agreement, including any provisions in relation to the University’s logo, name or brand. (48) Any breach of contract issues must be referred to Legal Services for management. (49) For the purpose of this Procedure: (50) Resources to support the implementation of this Procedure, including relevant Process Frameworks are available via the Third Party Programs and Partnerships intranet.Educational Partnerships Procedure - Third Party Arrangements
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Administrative – Vice-Chancellor
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Review Date
6 April 2026
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key decisions
Role
Final accountability for individual educational partnerships
Sponsor
Implementation of key responsibilities with agreements
Nominee of Sponsor
Quality assurance of all educational partnerships
Director, Higher Education Standards Registration
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - General
Part B - Compliance Responsibilities
Part C - Agreements
General
Initiation of an Arrangement by the Sponsor
Due Diligence, Risk Management and Consultation
New Agreements
Varying an Existing Agreement
Renewing an Agreement
Termination of an Agreement
Agreement Execution and Recordkeeping
Agreement Signing Ceremonies
Part D - Quality Assurance and Governance
Third Party Teaching Arrangements
Articulation
Student Mobility
Courseware Licensing
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 8 - Related Documents