(1) This Policy sets out the framework for disclosure, assessment and commercialisation of Exploitable Intellectual Property (IP) arising from research and teaching at the University. (2) The purpose of this Policy and procedure is to: (3) Applies to: (4) Under the Intellectual Property Statute 2009, the University owns IP generated by staff members in the course of employment, except for specified works which the authors own. (5) The University does not own IP created by students or honorary appointments, except by express assignment. (6) Staff members have an obligation to: (7) Students and honorary appointments have an obligation to declare any Exploitable IP arising in the course of studies or work at the University. (8) Staff members, students and honorary appointments should obtain and complete the Invention Disclosure and Assessment form. This form enables the collection of brief details of any Exploitable IP arising from their research at the University. (9) Completed forms should then be forwarded to the IP Officer for review. The Invention Disclosure and Assessment form may also be used by staff members, students and honorary appointments who wish to obtain an opinion from the IP Manager as to whether any potentially novel outcomes of research are Exploitable IP. (10) The IP Officer will ensure that disclosures made are reviewed in accordance with this Policy. (11) Receipt of disclosures will be acknowledged by the IP Officer within two (2) working days. (12) The IP Officer will review aspects of patentability, market potential, ownership, technical maturity and the research team provided in the disclosure. Decisions about protecting Exploitable IP, e.g. through patent applications, will be made in consultation with Creators, based on commercial criteria set out in the Invention Disclosure and Assessment form. (13) Persons making disclosures will be provided with responses within thirty (30) days confirming: (14) Students and honorary appointments making disclosures will additionally be asked to assist in determining whether: (15) If in the opinion of the IP Officer a staff member is a Creator or co-Creator of the subject of the disclosure, or there is an obligation to a third party, the IP Officer will respond to the person making the disclosure confirming the potential interest of the University in any Exploitable IP. (16) If the University decides to protect and exploit Exploitable IP, the University will require Creators who are staff members to sign an agreement confirming that the ownership of the IP rests with the University. In the case of Creators who are students and honorary appointments, the University will require an assignment of ownership of the IP. (17) If the University decides not to protect and exploit Exploitable IP, the University may offer the rights to the Creators on agreed conditions, which will usually include the University retaining a right to use the IP for its teaching and research. (18) Subject to budget and expenditure limits, the IP Officer may decide on initial provisional patent filings. The University will not normally invest in protection beyond the provisional patent stage except with the approval of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Industry Engagement) based on a business case or evidence of commercial interest or risk sharing with another organisation. (19) Once a provisional patent application has been filed, the IP Officer will consult with the Creator(s) regarding the persons to be named as inventors using the Inventorship Enquiry Form. (20) The University will also seek to secure its rights in the ownership of the Exploitable IP by seeking a confirmatory assignment of ownership from each of the inventors. (21) The University may also obtain confidentiality undertakings and assignments from any students involved in projects that involve or potentially involve Exploitable IP. (22) The University will support the Commercial Exploitation of Exploitable IP in consultation with the Creators having due regard for the preferences of Creators, ensuring fair terms for commercial rights to the Exploitable Intellectual Property through agreements with third parties, such as assignments, licences or collaborative research funding agreements. (23) The aims of Commercial Exploitation are, in order of priority: (24) Staff members, students and honorary appointments are encouraged to communicate the results of their research by submitting works for publication but must avoid undermining Exploitable IP through premature disclosure. (25) Once Exploitable IP has been declared to the University, the University will keep any delay in publication to the time reasonably necessary to assess and protect the Exploitable IP. (26) The University will maintain management arrangements to ensure prompt appraisals by professional staff. The University will not enter into contracts with third parties which prevent or delay publication except with the consent of the authors. (27) In the case of research students, the University will not agree to a delay which will prejudice completion of the student’s thesis or damage future career prospects. (28) A delay in public disclosure of Exploitable IP may be required for a reasonable period to enable due assessment of commercial potential and protection options. Normally the period of any such delay will not exceed three months. (29) Creators of Exploitable IP will be provided with professional advice about drafts of publications to reduce the risk of prejudicial disclosure. (30) If the University declines to protect and commercialise Exploitable IP in response to a disclosure, Creators are entitled to request an assignment of rights from the University on reasonable terms. The University may approve or decline the request and impose any conditions on its approval. (31) A decision to defer consideration of a disclosure on reasonable grounds or to decline or delay protection or commercialisation of Exploitable IP does not give rise to an entitlement to require assignment. (32) If the University receives Commercialisation Proceeds from the Commercial Exploitation of Exploitable IP other than Teaching Materials, Creators of that Exploitable IP will be entitled to a share of the Commercialisation Proceeds in accordance with the portions and processes set out in this Part G. (33) Commericalisation Proceeds shall be distributed annually in the portions defined as follows: (34) If there is more than one recognised Creator of Exploitable IP, the Creators’ share is shared between those Creators in accordance with their creative contributions to that Exploitable IP. The IP Officer may determine an equitable share based on the Creators’ creative contributions. (35) If a Creator personally holds or agrees to take equity in a company that has a licence or assignment from the University to exploit the Exploitable IP, then that Creator forgoes their rights to Commercialisation Proceeds in relation to that Exploitable IP . The University is not obliged to offer equity to a Creator in lieu of proceeds. Any equity taken by a Creator will be subject to applicable legal terms directly between the Creator and that company. Creators must disclose any such equity to the University. (36) The Business Development and Commercialisation (BD&C) team will contact each of the Creators to advise on the amount payable and period for which the commercialisation proceeds relate to. Each Creator will need to complete a Commercialisation Proceeds Distribution Form specifying how they would like their share to be disbursed, noting that there may be tax implications that apply. The options available are: (37) Once all information has been received, the Royalty Distribution form will be approved by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Industry Engagement) (DVC(R&IE)) and then all paperwork will be sent to the appropriate financial delegate for payment processing separate from payroll. (38) Teaching materials developed for La Trobe subjects and courses are owned by the University, although staff continue to have entitlement for use and re-use in other contexts, including in teaching work but not for commercial sale or licensing purposes. (39) The University encourages the authors of teaching materials to consider making such materials publicly and freely available, e.g. via the internet, or publishing commercially providing that those materials are not subject to a prior third party agreement, such as a contract for the design or delivery of a course or training program. (40) Staff members may make those teaching materials of which they are the authors freely and publicly available without approval, provided that, where teaching materials have been co-authored, all authors are consulted and agree. (41) Proposals to deal in, i.e., to license or assign to another party, rights in teaching materials must be approved by the author’s Dean. Contracts involving such transactions, such as licence agreements or contracts to deliver teaching services, must be approved in accordance with policies and procedures related to licensing of teaching materials (See Educational Partnerships Policy and Educational Partnerships Procedure – Third Party Arrangements). (42) Any commercial proceeds from dealing in teaching materials will be available to the authors’ Schools or Centres as discretionary income. (43) In accordance with section 7(2) of the Intellectual Property Statute 2009, a Staff member is not entitled to Commercialisation Proceeds for Teaching Materials. (44) Without derogating from any other right of appeal or review under University legislation, any person who has an interest in a decision made under this Policy or these procedures may request the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Industry Engagement) to review the decision. (45) For the purpose of this Policy and Procedures: (46) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009.Intellectual Property Policy
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Pro Vice-Chancellor (Industry Engagement)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Director, Business Development and Commercialisation
Review Date
5 December 2027
Section 2 - Purpose
Top of PageSection 3 - Scope
Top of PageSection 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Decision to protect and exploit Exploitable IP
IP Officer
Review of decision under this Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Industry Engagement) (DVC(R&IE))
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Disclosing Exploitable IP
Part B - Appraisal of Invention Disclosure for Exploitable IP
Exploitable IP, Assignment and Reversion
Part C - Managing and Protecting Exploitable IP
Part D - Commercialisation of Exploitable IP
Part E - Publication of Exploitable IP
Part F - Reversion of IP to Creators
Part G - Commercialisation Proceeds
Recipient
Share
Creators
50%
Schools
25%
Central
25%
Part H - Dealing in Teaching Materials
Part I - Primary Reviews of Decisions
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 8 - Authority and Associated Information
View Document
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.