(1) This Policy outlines the conditions and processes adopted by the University to monitor, assess and support the academic progression of enrolled students in keeping with the Higher Education Standards Framework 2021, Commonwealth legislation and the Academic Progress Statute 2010. (2) This Policy applies to all students in any award coursework course. (3) This Policy does not apply to students enrolled for higher degrees by research at the University, who should refer to La Trobe University’s Academic Progress Statute 2010 and the following policies: (4) The University is committed to supporting all students, irrespective of their educational background, entry pathway, mode or place of study to achieve their goals in higher education. In terms of this Policy this means that: (5) Trends in rates of retention, progression and completion of specific student cohorts are monitored to fulfil legislated reporting requirements and to inform the University’s admission practices, course design, and targeted support provision. (6) The University recognises that students may experience difficulties with academic progression for circumstances beyond their control, or where their original choice of course was unsuitable. Students who are excluded from their original course as an outcome of academic progression management may reapply for admission to their course or another course of the University after any conditions of their exclusion have been met. The approach to any subsequent difficulties with academic progression will take account of a student’s past record. (7) Academic progression in a coursework course is assessed at designated points in time, known as Progression Periods. Progression Periods are aligned with the end of the University's teaching periods. (8) Where students pass all the subjects in which they are enrolled no interventions are made. (9) Students who experience subject failure will trigger one of three stages of academic progression: (10) The thresholds at which students are assessed as having triggered a progression stage are outlined in Table One with the associated support and interventions. (11) Late or changed results do not trigger or reverse progression outcomes that have already been determined for a previous progression period. (12) Where an international student triggers an academic progression stage and it becomes evident that they cannot complete their course within the expected duration outlined on their Commencement of Enrolment (CoE) they may have their duration of study extended. Where this occurs the student is responsible for making an application to extend their CoE. (13) Students enrolled in thesis subjects worth 30, 45 or 60 credit points will not have an enrolment restriction or cancellation applied to these subjects. (14) Students who trigger AP1 receive a communication that includes: (15) Student engagement with academic support at AP1 is tracked for consideration in future academic progression stages as appropriate. (16) Students who trigger AP2 receive a communication advising: (17) During the academic recovery workshop students are required to engage in self-assessment and action plan generation. They may seek additional advice where required from ASK La Trobe, a Student Advisor or their Course Coordinator. (18) Students who trigger AP3 receive a communication: (19) Where a student fails to make a show cause submission within 10 business days, they will be advised that the University will take steps to exclude them from their course to be effective at the commencement of the next applicable teaching period. (20) Student Advisors review a student’s show cause submission and submit a preliminary recommendation to the nominated senior academic staff member. A student’s level of engagement with AP1 or AP2 interventions will be taken into consideration in making a recommendation. (21) Following the final outcome decision by the academic staff member a communication is sent to the student advising: (22) Any enrolment restrictions imposed at AP3 will take into account the circumstances of students who: (23) Records of all academic progression communications, interventions and engagement from students are maintained on students’ files. Where a student who has been subject to academic progression management: (24) Students may seek a review of any decision made under this Policy through the University Appeals Committee (UAC) under the provisions of the Academic Progress Statute 2010. Students must apply for such a review within twenty (20) business days of notification of the decision (note this timeframe differs from that outlined in the Statute to fulfil requirements under ESOS legislation). (25) The decision of the UAC is the final decision of the University. The University Ombudsman is not able to review decisions made by the UAC, however, students who have concerns about any aspect of the process or the way in which this Policy has been applied (as opposed to the decision or outcome) may lodge a complaint with the University Ombudsman. (26) Students who remain dissatisfied after all University processes have been exhausted may choose to lodge a complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is an independent service and is free. (27) Data and reporting on student success and progression is supplied by the University’s Data and Performance Analytics team. Trends are analysed to inform any recommendations for practice, especially as they relate to the progression of identified sub-cohorts. (28) Education Committee is charged with monitoring the outcomes of this Policy and the processes and supports for academic progression on behalf of Academic Board. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) portfolio, through its divisions, is responsible for supporting and managing student academic progression and coordinating any response to any recommendations arising from monitoring and analysis. (29) For the purposes of this Policy and Procedure: (30) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009 . (31) A full list of subjects classified as workplace-based subjects can be found by accessing the:Academic Progression Review Policy
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic - Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Deputy Director, Student Advising
Review Date
2 December 2027
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
/ Role
Decision to restrict or exclude a student from enrolment after failure to satisfactorily show cause
Academic Progression Officer: nominated senior academic (Level C or higher)
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Monitoring and Determining Academic Progression
Part B - Details of Academic Progression Stages
Table One – Summary of Thresholds and Interventions
Stage
Thresholds
Communication or Intervention
Green
Student has passed the subjects in which they are enrolled
No intervention or communication
Triggered when a student fails one subject for the first time other than a workplace-based subject
- AP1 support communication
- Academic Recovery Module
- Support from Library and Learning Services Teams
Support and Sanction
(AP2)- AmberTriggered when a student:
- fails for the first time any workplace-based subject, or
- fails 50% or more of their enrolled credit points for the first time, or
- fails the same subject in a course for a second time, or
- triggers AP1 more than three times.
Students enrolled in subjects other than workplace-based subjects
Students enrolled in workplace-based subjects
Triggering AP1 more than three times
Show Cause and Exclusion (AP3)- Red
- fails for a second time any workplace-based subject, or
- fails 50% or more of their enrolled credit points for the second time, or
- fails the same subject in a course for the third time, or
- exceeds the maximum completion date for their course, or
- reaches AP3 for a second time (in a same or different course). This only applies where a restriction was imposed as the outcome for the first AP3 instance.
AP3 support communication, including:
- invitation to show cause
Show cause submission and assessment
- enrolment load restriction of maximum of 45 credit points or less applied.Academic Progression Stage One – Recovery
Academic Stage Two – Support and Sanction
Academic Progression Stage Three – Show Cause and Exclusion
Show Cause
Academic Review and Determination
Course Transfers and New Courses
Part C - Review
Part D - Quality Assurance
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 8 - Authority and Associated Information
View Document
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Recovery
(API)- Yellow
- AP2 support communication requiring attendance at academic recovery workshop (all students)
- Attendance at workshop required to lift any restrictions applied
- A maximum enrolment of 45 credit points is applied in the next Progression Period
The Course Coordinator will review the student’s ability to progress to determine whether an enrolment restriction should be applied.
If a student passes all subjects they will not be identified as AP2 based on historical data
Triggered when a student:
- advice of potential exclusion
Possible outcomes:
- exclusion upheld, or