Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This Policy and Procedure gives effect to the requirements of the University Appeals Committee Statute 2009. It provides the basis upon which students may make a formal appeal to the University Appeals Committee against a decision taken by an officer or committee of the University under relevant Statutes. (2) Unless specifically exempted in this document, this Policy applies to persons seeking admission to, or currently or previously enrolled in, any La Trobe University subject or award course, including those conducted by third parties (for ease of reference all are referred to as students in this Policy). (3) Officers or committees of the University will, from time to time, make determinations in relation to individual students. Students affected by such determinations have the right to seek a review of or appeal these decisions. The processes by which a student seeks a review or appeal depend on the nature of the decision made and the authority under which the decision is made. (4) The University will respect the rights of students by: (5) The University will support students by: (6) The University has established the University Appeals Committee (UAC) to hear and decide appeals relating to decisions made under specific Statutes and regulations of the University. (7) Students who are subject to any processes under this Policy participate at no cost to themselves and may also seek confidential and free support from the Student Advocacy Service. (8) Where the student is an international student, advice may be sought from the Manager, International Student Support as to whether there are additional ESOS implications, such as: (9) The University will record all student appeal matters in accordance with the requirements of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021, the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 and the University’s Records Management Policy. (10) Appeals will be managed in accordance with the University Privacy Policy. This means, among other things, that: (11) The Vice-Chancellor is responsible for appointing members of the UAC as per the requirements of the University Appeals Committee Regulations 2014. (12) Enough members of the UAC will be nominated to ensure, as far as is reasonably possible, that there will be at least eight UAC members appointed at any one time. Wherever practicable the academic membership of the UAC will be distributed across Schools. (13) The Conflict of Interest Policy applies to all UAC members for all UAC business. (14) The University Appeals Committee Statute 2009 restricts the jurisdiction of the UAC to only those decisions made by or under the following University Statutes. These include: (15) The Statutes above and any associated policies and procedures will be made available to students on the University website. (16) The UAC will not consider or conduct hearings in relation to any other matter. University decisions outside of the jurisdiction of the UAC include, but are not limited to: (17) For students who hold a packaged offer for a La Trobe course and a pathway course wholly delivered by a third party provider, determinations made by an officer of the third-party provider relating to the pathway course are also outside the jurisdiction of the UAC. These matters should be referred to the third-party provider in line with that provider’s policies and procedures. (18) Any member of the UAC may make an initial determination as to whether the nature of the appeal falls within the remit of the UAC. This determination may also be delegated to the Secretariat. (19) Where a request for appeal with the UAC is declined, the Secretariat will provide advice to the student of the appropriate procedure and contact for the issue being raised. (20) Students may lodge an appeal on the grounds laid out in the statutes within the jurisdiction of the UAC: (21) Students must lodge an appeal within 20 business days of receiving a determination, unless otherwise outlined by statute, policy or procedure. The UAC may extend this deadline at their discretion and may delegate the ability to extend this deadline to the Secretariat. (22) Within 10 business days of lodging an appeal, students will be advised whether the nature of the appeal falls within the remit of the UAC, processes to be followed and information regarding available support. (23) When a student appeals the determination of a University officer or committee, the determination will not take effect until the appeal is considered and the outcome is provided by the UAC. (24) All students who are able to demonstrate acceptable grounds for an appeal against a determination that is within the jurisdiction of the UAC are entitled to a hearing. Hearings may be conducted face to face, by phone or online. A student may waive their right to a hearing. (25) In order to facilitate the timely resolution of appeals, hearings will be scheduled as soon as possible after an appeal is lodged. In arranging a suitable time for a hearing, the Secretariat of the UAC must make all reasonable accommodations for the student, taking into account the student’s personal circumstances. (26) A waiver of right to a hearing may be presumed where: (27) The UAC may, at its sole discretion, elect to conduct the hearing despite a presumed or actual waiver of a right to a hearing. (28) The Chair for an individual hearing is selected from the membership on the day of the hearing. The quorum for a UAC hearing is three. Should a quorum not be achieved due to conflicts of interest and/or committee member absence, the Vice-Chancellor may co-opt a suitably qualified member of staff as a temporary member of the Committee. (29) Hearings are bound by the rules of natural justice. Students may be accompanied at a hearing by a support person who is neither a legal practitioner nor person with law degree. The support person is not entitled to make submissions or present arguments to the Committee during the hearing or act as an advocate for the student without the permission of the UAC. (30) While a formal proceeding of the University, hearings should be conducted with as little formality as possible. (31) Hearings are not bound by the rules of evidence. The Secretariat of the UAC may request, but not compel, a student to provide evidence in support of the grounds for their appeal. Students are encouraged to present this evidence prior to their hearing, but evidence may be presented by the student at the hearing. (32) The Chair of the UAC may seek advice from a suitably qualified member of staff on complex matters before, during or after the hearing. The Chair of the UAC may further seek advice from a suitably qualified person external to the University but may only do so with the student’s written permission. (33) The UAC may overturn, vary or uphold a determination of a University officer or committee. (34) Where the UAC cannot reach agreement on an appeal, the decision of the Chair will be taken as the decision of the committee. (35) The decision of the UAC will usually be communicated to the student in writing within five business days of the decision being taken. Students will be informed in instances where the complexity of a matter requires additional time for it to be considered. (36) Once the outcome has been communicated to the student, it is also forwarded to the relevant University areas for immediate action. Decisions of the UAC will also be communicated to the University officer or committee that made the original determination. (37) The decision of the UAC is the final decision of the University. The University Ombudsman is not able to review decisions made by the UAC. Students who are dissatisfied with a decision made by the UAC may choose to lodge a complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is an independent service and is free. (38) Students who have concerns about any aspect of the process or the way in which this Policy has been applied (as opposed to the decision or outcome) may lodge a complaint with the University Ombudsman. (39) The Integrity Office produces a report each year for submission to the Education Committee. The report includes: (40) Following endorsement by the Education Committee the report is submitted to Academic Board and then to the University Council for noting. (41) For the purpose of this Policy and Procedure: (42) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009.Appeals Policy
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Academic – Academic Board
Accountable Executive – Policy
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic)
Responsible Manager – Policy
Deputy Director, Integrity and Investigations
Review Date
4 October 2027
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key Decisions
Role
Assessment as to whether an appeal application meets the required grounds
University Appeals Committee (UAC) (or delegate)
Determination of the outcome of an appeal
UAC
Extension to deadline for students lodging an appeal against a determination
UAC (or delegate)
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Top of PageSection 6 - Procedures
Part A - Composition of the University Appeals Committee
Part B - Jurisdiction of the University Appeals Committee
Part C - Grounds for Appeal
Part D - Lodging an Appeal
Part E - Effect of Appeals on Student Status
Part F - Conduct of Hearings
Part G - Decisions of the University Appeals Committee
Part H - Further Review or Complaints
Part I - Reporting
Section 7 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 8 - Authority and Associated Information