(1) Grievances can result from work-related problems which a staff member believes to be unfair, inequitable, discriminatory and/or creates an unsafe work environment. They are often the result of unresolved work related issues, problems, or conflicts that have been avoided or not addressed to the satisfaction of those involved. Examples include a staff: (2) This Procedure sets out the University’s position on providing a means by which staff can have a grievance resolved which is fair, transparent, timely and in a manner which maintains positive relationships. (3) Grievances raised under this Procedure are limited to those as detailed in the Collective Agreement. All other matters must be raised in accordance with the relevant policy/procedure or particular Collective Agreement provision unless stated otherwise in the relevant policy/procedure. (4) This Procedure is written in support of the Collective Agreement and does not intend to replace the relevant clause in the Collective Agreement. (5) Disputes relating to the Collective Agreement and/or National Employment Standards(NES) are dealt with separately in accordance with ‘Dispute Settling Procedures’ detailed in the Collective Agreement. (6) Grievances relating to students can be raised through this procedure by a staff member. The assigned investigator will work collaboratively with the student complaints department in resolving the grievance. (7) Students wishing to raise a grievance against a staff member must do so through the relevant student complaints procedure. (8) Staff who are also students may lodge a grievance either according to this Procedure or according to the Student Complaints Management Policy and must declare on lodging their grievance that they are also a student at the University. (9) The assigned investigator of a grievance lodged by a staff member who is also a student, will determine whether the Procedure or the Student Complaints Management Policy is the most appropriate channel for handling the grievance. The investigator will take into account the complainant’s primary relationship with the University and their relationship to the subject of the complaint. (10) The investigating officer will also determine whether the complaint is about a staff member who is also a student. If the complaint is about a staff member who is also a student, the investigating officer will determine whether relevant student policies and procedures or relevant staff policies and procedures are the most appropriate standard for assessing the complaint. (11) The University is committed to: (12) Refer to the Workforce Management Policy. (13) Grievances will be managed in accordance with the Collective Agreement however are detailed below for ease of reference. (14) Should the Collective Agreement clause be amended or changed, the new Collective Agreement clause will replace the below. (15) Staff may be assisted by a Representative at any stage in the grievance process, including the lodgement of a formal grievance. (16) Where a concern or issue is not resolved at the local work area through informal discussions or is not appropriate to be managed at this level due to its complex or serious nature, the grievance will be formally lodged in writing to the relevant supervisor for action. The grievance will outline the nature of the employee’s concerns and the outcome sought by the employee. Where the grievance involves the supervisor, or there is a perceived conflict of interest, the grievance should be lodged with the supervisor’s supervisor or with Human Resources. (17) Supervisors and staff may seek advice and assistance from a staff member from Human Resources at any stage of the grievance process. (18) The grievance will be acknowledged in writing as soon as practical and no later than 5 working days from receipt of the formal notification. The supervisor may provide Human Resources with a copy of all relevant information and may consult with them about managing the grievance. (19) The supervisor or a staff member from Human Resources will initially meet with the employee/s to obtain detailed information about the grievance, explain how the grievance policy works and identify through discussion the main issues to be resolved or investigated. Wherever possible the complainant will guide the course of action. (20) The supervisor or a staff member from Human Resources will then determine the best course of action, which may include the following: relevant information gathering, arranging for conciliation or mutually agreed mediation, or arranging for a formal investigation of the matter in consultation with Human Resources. (21) The grievance handling processes and expected timelines for grievance resolution, the need for confidentiality and their protection from victimisation will be explained to the employee. They will be told that should the grievance progress to a formal investigation of other employee/s the relevant details of the grievance will be provided to these party/s to ensure that there is natural justice. (22) If the grievance is resolved the resolution of the grievance will be confirmed in writing to the employee and others party to the grievance. If there are any actions arising from this resolution which have an impact on another employee or employees, these will be explained to them whilst being mindful to ensure the confidentiality of the direct parties. (23) If the grievance cannot be resolved by the supervisor or staff member from Human Resources, or there has been a delay in resolving the grievance beyond 30 days, or the supervisor or staff member from Human Resources believes that misconduct or serious misconduct has taken place, the matter will be referred to the Executive Director, Human Resources, with information about the resolution steps that have been taken to date. (24) The Executive Director, Human Resources will consider all relevant information, and may request that additional information is obtained and documented, initiate further investigation or where necessary refer the matter through Clause 77 (Disciplinary Procedures)of the Collective Agreement. The Executive Director, Human Resources will issue a written report of the final outcome to the person who raised the grievance and others party to the grievance, including any further steps that may be required to resolve the grievance and any steps that are required to prevent a recurrence of the circumstances that gave rise to the grievance. (25) Following the resolution of a grievance lodged by or about a staff member who is also a student, the supervisor or a staff member from Human Resources may refer the matter to the Director, Student Administration for further review in accordance with the Student Behaviours Policy and relevant policies. (26) Withdrawals must be made in writing to the person handling the grievance. (27) The University may still have an obligation to investigate the grievance pending the nature of the grievance lodged – Refer ‘Legal Issues’ below. (28) If someone is found to have raised a false or deliberately misleading claim against another person they may face disciplinary action which may result in (but not limited to) counselling, a written apology to the person complained about, an official warning or termination of employment/relationship. (29) Confidentiality must be adhered to during and after the process of making and resolving grievances. (30) Staff may only discuss the grievance with those legitimately and directly involved in the grievance or in its resolution. (31) This confidentiality requirement seeks to protect the rights and privacy of all involved and to ensure a comfortable and productive working environment. Should a staff member’s grievance become more widely known, there is the potential for undue embarrassment and workplace tension. In addition, it is less likely the grievance will be successfully resolved. (32) Breaches of confidentiality could result in disciplinary action being taken. (33) Making secret recordings of conversations (on devices such as phones, recorders etc.) undermines the confidentiality and integrity of the process of grievance resolution therefore the University strictly prohibits recordings without explicit consent from all parties involved in a conversation. Should consent be obtained, such consent to be recorded in writing and on the recording device at the commencement of the recording. (34) Should a serious allegation be raised, the University may have a legal obligation to investigate even if the staff does not wish to pursue the matter. (35) Victimisation in the workplace occurs if a person subjects or threatens to subject another person to a ‘detriment’, because that other person has: (36) The University prohibits retaliation against staff members or an external work related person just because that person is a party to a grievance. Should a University staff member victimise someone who has raised a grievance or is party to a grievance, the University will take action in accordance with a breach of policy. (37) If someone raises a genuine grievance directly with a person, it should be appreciated that an opportunity is being offered to address an issue and potentially averting a more formal grievance. (38) Staff may access the La Trobe University Ombudsman at any stage however the steps laid down in the Collective Agreement should be attempted in the first instance. (39) Complaints about administrative actions and decisions of the University can be made to the Victorian Ombudsman (www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au/). The Ombudsman is, generally, the office of last resort. If you have not followed the steps laid down in the Collective Agreement,the Ombudsman may ask the staff member to do so before accepting a complaint. (40) University staff have the right to seek assistance from an external body/authority (including their Union) at any stage. For example: (41) A staff member who is a party to a grievance has the right to have a support person present at meetings. If the staff member chooses not to have a support person the process will still continue. (42) A support person can be (other than a practicing solicitor or barrister) a union representative, friend, family member or a work colleague. They are nominated by a staff member to provide support on their behalf, but are not entitled to make representations or act as an advocate. (43) The role of the support person is to provide professional and moral support to the staff concerned. He or she may also act as a witness or observer to the process. (44) The support person should not disrupt the process, direct the process or otherwise interfere with the meeting. The support person is not there to advocate on behalf of the staff member. (45) Should a support person attempt to intervene, direct the process or advocate on behalf of the staff, he or she should be warned that this contravenes the role of support person. If the support person persists, the support person may be asked to leave the meeting and the meeting may be terminated and rescheduled, with potentially another support person. (46) It is not appropriate for meetings to be unreasonably delayed due to the unavailability of a staff member’s support person. If this occurs, the staff will be advised to nominate another support person. However, reasonable attempts should be made to achieve agreed meeting times. (47) A support person should not have had any involvement in the incident being discussed. (48) Reasonable management action, carried out in a fair way, is not bullying (albeit some experiences can be uncomfortable for those involved). Managers have a right to direct the way work is carried out, to monitor the work and give feedback on performance. Examples of reasonable management action may include: (49) Staff Members are responsible: (50) Managers are responsible for: (51) There are people and resources available to assist or support staff and provide information, advice or appropriate referrals. Support options may include: (52) The University has listed the most relevant law in Australia relating to this topic however it is not limited to the legislation listed (see Associated Information). (53) For the purpose of this Procedure:Grievance Resolution (Staff) Procedure
This procedure is being updated to reflect the new Enterprise Agreement and may currently contain out of date information. If you have any questions, please lodge an Ask HR ticket.
Section 1 - Background and Purpose
Preamble
Section 2 - Scope
Grievance Coverage
Students
Staff Who Are Also Students
General
Top of Page
Section 3 - Policy
Section 4 - Procedures
Lodging a Grievance
Grievance Handling Procedures
Withdrawing a Grievance
Legal Issues
False, Malicious and Vexatious Claims
Staff Confidentiality
Recording Conversations
Obligation to Act
Victimisation
Other Options for Assistance
Complaints
Assistance and/or Unresolved Grievances
Support Person
Who May be a Support Person
The Role of the Support Person
Performance Management
Responsibilities
Further Assistance
Legislation
Section 5 - Definitions
View Document
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.