Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) The University is committed to equal opportunity and appropriate professional behaviour in the workplace. This Policy specifically covers discrimination (direct/indirect and legal protections), harassment (general, sexual and racial), bullying (direct/indirect and intentional/unintentional), vilification and victimisation, occupational violence, and personal relationships. (2) The University is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace environment. (3) All staff, contractors, agents, official visitors and other individuals performing services/work for and on behalf of the University (collectively referred to as staff throughout this Policy) have a right to work in an environment which is free from unacceptable behaviour including discrimination, harassment, bullying, victimisation, violence and racial/religious vilification and other forms of unacceptable behaviour as deemed by the University and to be treated with dignity and respect. This Policy also details the University’s commitment to reducing the risk of harm in relation to alcohol and drug use. (4) The Procedures provide guidance for understanding: (5) The Workplace Issue Resolution (Staff) Procedure sets out the procedure for responding to grievances lodged in accordance with the La Trobe University Enterprise Agreement 2023. (6) This Policy applies to all (7) This Policy does not apply to reasonable and legitimate management action. (8) Staff who are also students may lodge a complaint either according to this Procedure or according to the Student Complaints Management Policy. They must declare on lodging their grievance that they are also (10) La Trobe is committed to: (11) Behaviour must comply with the Code of Conduct and the University’s values. (12) Behaviour relating to discrimination, harassment, bullying, victimisation, vilification and violence is not tolerated or accepted at the University, and is against the law. (14) The University expects all staff: (15) The University expects managers to: (16) Unacceptable workplace behaviour will be dealt with having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case. (17) Any action taken in relation to unacceptable workplace behaviour will be managed under these Procedures. (18) Breaches of this Policy and the Procedure may lead to a variety of outcomes; for example an apology or training, through to (but not limited to) termination of employment. (19) In the case of Alcohol or Drugs, should La Trobe suspect/observe an impairment/inappropriate behaviour, La Trobe may, at its prerogative, take any of the following actions (but not limited to): (20) Outcomes may include (but are not limited to): (21) Discrimination may occur when distinctions are made between individuals/groups so as to disadvantage some and advantage others. It can be classified as either direct or indirect. (22) Direct discrimination is when someone is treated less favourably on the grounds of an attribute covered by the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 regardless of the discriminator’s motive and whether they are aware of the discrimination or consider the treatment less favourable. (23) Indirect discrimination occurs when a requirement (or rule) that appears to be neutral and the same for everyone in fact has the effect of disadvantaging someone because they have an attribute covered by the Equal Opportunity Act 2010. The effect has to be unreasonable. (24) In some situations the legislation may provide exceptions to discrimination or permit what would otherwise be unlawful discrimination. (25) Section 6 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 details the legal protections in employment which are intended to ensure the treatment of staff and potential staff is fair, equitable and non-discriminatory on the grounds of the following attributes: (26) Harassment occurs when uninvited or unwelcome behaviour causes someone, or a group of people, to feel intimidated, insulted or humiliated. It can occur in a single incident or a series of incidents. Harassment may also be experienced as a result of witnessing behaviour not directed to that person e.g. overhearing an unacceptable joke. Each person perceives things differently as their values and experiences are unique to them. They therefore, may react differently to how someone might expect them to react. (27) Sexual harassment refers to an unwelcome sexual advance, an unwelcome request for sexual favours or other unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature in person or via electronic/social media. It includes: (28) In Australia, sexual harassment (and victimisation) is unlawful under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) as well as anti-discrimination legislation operating in every State and Territory. (29) If the recipient does not object to unacceptable behaviour in the workplace at the time it occurs, it does not necessarily mean that they are consenting to the behaviour. In determining if sexual harassment has occurred the question asked is "would a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances, have anticipated that the person harassed would feel offended, humiliated or intimidated?" (30) Sexual harassment in the workplace occurs when it happens at work and at work-related events. (31) There are specific sexual harassment provisions for educational institutions in the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, Section 28F. (32) Racial harassment is another form of harassment. It describes any unwelcome conduct in relation to a person’s colour, race, nationality, social or ethnic origin or extraction. It can range from relatively minor abuse to physical violence. It can be discriminatory remarks, behaviours or practices which show racial intolerance against another University representative. (33) Workplace bullying is the repeated unreasonable and less favourable treatment of a person. It includes behaviour that intimidates, degrades or humiliates a staff member and may create a risk to their health and safety. (34) Repeated behaviour refers to the persistent nature of the behaviour and can refer to a range of behaviours over time. (35) Unreasonable behaviour means behaviour that a reasonable person, having regard for the circumstances, would see as victimising, humiliating, undermining or threatening. (36) Bullying behaviour can range from obvious verbal or physical assault (occupational violence) to very subtle psychological abuse and usually, but not always, utilises power attributed to status, skills or position. (37) Bullying may also be discrimination if it is because of age, sex, pregnancy, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion or certain other reasons and can also take the form of cyber/social media bullying which is done through the use of technology; for example, using the internet such as social media, a mobile phone or a camera to humiliate or embarrass someone. (38) Bullying can involve many different forms of unreasonable behaviour, which can be obvious (direct) or subtle (indirect). (39) Examples of direct bullying include: (40) Examples of indirect bullying include: (41) Bullying can be intentional, where someone’s actions are intended to humiliate, intimidate or distress, whether or not the behaviour resulted in that effect. (42) Bullying can also be unintentional. Although not intended to, the actions can humiliate, intimidate, distress, cause and could reasonably have been expected to cause that effect. Sometimes people do not realise that their behaviour can be harmful to others. In some situations, behaviours may unintentionally cause distress and be perceived as bullying. (43) Vilification occurs when someone incites hatred towards, serious contempt for or severely ridicules a person or group of persons on the grounds of their race, religion, sexuality, gender identity, colour, nationality, descent, ethnicity, ethno-religious status, national origin, homosexuality, HIV or aids status or trans-gender status, disability, sexual orientation or lawful sexual activity. (44) Victimisation in the workplace occurs if a University representative subjects or threatens to subject another University representative to a ‘detriment’, because that other person has: (45) Conduct likely to constitute a detriment in employment includes demotion, dismissal, transfer, suspension, loss of a benefit, being refused further contract work, being excluded from work or work related social functions and being the subject of gossip or innuendo. (46) The University prohibits retaliation against staff or an external work related person just because that person is a party to a complaint of unacceptable behaviour. Should a University representative victimise someone who has raised a complaint or is party to a complaint, the University will take action in accordance with a breach of this Policy. (47) If someone raises a genuine complaint directly with a person, it should be appreciated that an opportunity is being offered to address certain behaviour and potentially averting a more formal complaint. (48) Occupational violence is any incident where a University representative or student is physically attacked or threatened with physical violence in the workplace. (49) This definition expressly includes domestic violence that extends to the workplace, for example staff who are married and an act of violence occurs within this relationship on University premises. (50) Any act of violence that takes place in the workplace will be investigated internally and may also involve external parties such as the Police. (51) It is not sexual harassment to develop friendships or relationships with other people at work based on mutual attraction, friendship and respect and if the interaction is consensual, welcome and reciprocated it is not sexual harassment. (52) The University expects all staff to act ethically, with integrity and to maintain the highest professional standards at work. Those staff in personal relationships with other staff must: (53) Where any conflict of interest has been identified, it will be managed in accordance with the Conflict of Interest Policy. (54) Should the University identify any behaviour/relationship which it believes to be unacceptable, disruptive or affect the work environment in a negative manner it reserves the right to review the work situation and take appropriate steps to avoid and/or resolve the situation. Refer to the Conflict of Interest Policy for further information on personal relationships. (55) In so doing, the staff member/s who is/are the subject of the relationship may be required to undertake any and all reasonable steps and directions to resolve or avoid the issue to the extent necessary to protect the interests of the University and/or other staff. (56) Other than the immediate workplace (including campus), ‘workplace’ also extends to work social functions, conferences and events either organised by the University or organised by external parties and sanctioned by the University to attend on behalf of the University. (57) It is a requirement that professional behaviour must be adhered to when staff attend any social functions, conferences or events. (58) Everyone in the workplace has a responsibility when it comes to health and safety. There are a range of factors that impact on a staff member’s ability to work safely; alcohol and drugs are just one of them. (59) Under Section 21 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004, La Trobe has a duty of care to staff and they in turn are responsible for working in a manner that is not harmful to the health and safety of themselves or others at La Trobe. Staff are obliged to present for work in a fit state, so that in carrying out normal work activities they do not: (60) The University will not tolerate unsafe, unwelcome or offensive behaviour caused by the irresponsible consumption of alcohol or drugs by staff members. (61) When staff attend a business related event or are representing La Trobe at an event hosted by a third party the following applies: (62) Should the University suspect/observe an impairment/inappropriate behaviour, the University may, at its prerogative, remove staff from a campus or University business activity. (63) Staff are responsible for their own behaviour, their obligation to act responsibly, and not be impaired by alcohol or drugs while at the workplace. (64) Staff must not consume, possess, solicit, sell, distribute, manufacture/produce illegal drugs on campus or in any University work or study environment. (65) Staff who operate vehicles, equipment, machinery (‘resources’) or work within laboratories must not be impaired by or have consumed any alcohol/illicit drugs or be impaired by legal drugs whilst operating the resources or working within laboratories. (66) Staff driving a La Trobe motor vehicle must: (67) Staff who have breached the policy will be held accountable for their actions and may face disciplinary action in accordance with the Enterprise Agreement. (68) La Trobe may require a staff member to present a valid medical certification confirming the staff member is fit to undertake the requirements of their position prior to their return to duties. (69) Every effort should be made to protect the staff member’s privacy at work and to maintain confidentiality. (70) If a staff member is “on call”, they are required to be available when called and to meet the requirements of this Policy and Procedure. (71) If a staff member is “called out” unexpectedly when not on call and the staff member suspects they are or may be impaired, they must inform the manager that this may be the case and are unavailable. Disclosing this to the manager is not a breach of the Policy or Procedure. (72) Breaches of this Policy as a result of the consumption of alcohol/drugs will not be tolerated. Being under the influence of alcohol/drugs will not be accepted as an excuse for behaviour which is unacceptable. (73) Staff are not in breach of this Policy as a result of taking prescription drugs/medications prescribed to them, however, should taking a prescription drug/medication result in impaired behaviour which creates a risk to the health and safety of others and/or causes damage to the University resources, this will be managed accordingly. Staff should discuss any prescription or over the counter medication that may have an impairing effect with their manager to ensure everyone’s safety. (74) Staff are not to use any University equipment in a manner that may breach any University Policy or breach any local legislation. (75) More particularly, people must not create, send, store, upload, access, use, solicit, publish or link the University equipment/brand to: (76) Examples include (but not limited to) mobile devices and computers. Refer to the Use of Computer Facilities Statute 2009. (77) A condition of having a staff identification card is understanding and agreeing that the card is not transferable. A staff identification card can only be used by the person named on the card and cannot be loaned or shared with another person. (78) If a person believes they have experienced unacceptable behaviour or if they have been a witness to such behaviour, the University strongly encourages people to do something about it. Ignoring this behaviour might be interpreted by the other person as consent or acceptance or may even place people at risk/harm. (79) Staff must not respond to unacceptable behaviour with more unacceptable behaviour. (80) Staff can lodge a complaint even if they are not a party to an incident. For example, a person may complain if they overhear a racist joke made in the workplace and find this joke objectionable or if they witness one person assaulting another person. (81) The University encourages people to take the time to follow the correct process or seek help from their Manager, Next Up Manager, Safer Community or another support person should they feel aggrieved by unacceptable workplace behaviour. (82) The University encourages reporting of unacceptable behaviour and therefore provides a complaint procedure for dealing with complaints relating to workplace behaviours. (83) The person raising a complaint has the right to: (84) The principles of the complaint resolution process are: (85) The University has a legal responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent unacceptable behaviour in the workplace. This Procedure is an important part of those steps. (86) The University takes all complaints very seriously. Where a complaint has been made, it will be reviewed and, if proven, appropriate disciplinary action may be taken. We will take all reasonable steps to ensure that parties involved in the complaint will not be victimised or treated unfairly. (87) Complaints that are vexatious or malicious may result in disciplinary action. (88) It is recommended that staff initially try to resolve a complaint personally with the other party/parties. If the staff member is comfortable to try this approach, it is generally the most effective way to ensure the continuation of a harmonious working relationship. (89) Staff should consider lodging a formal complaint where: (90) The below process provides an opportunity to resolve the complaint in a timely and fair manner. (91) In the first instance, staff should submit their complaint, to Safer Community via the form available on the Safer Community intranet. (92) Where appropriate Safer Community will refer the complaint to the Executive Director, Human Resources or nominee. (93) To ensure consistency and fairness, the below process is usually followed where a decision to investigate a complaint has been made by Human Resources (the order of events may change and an independent person who is external to the University may be used to conduct the investigation): (94) The person managing a complaint (case manager) lodged by a staff member who is also a student will determine whether this Policy or the Student Conduct Management Policy is the most appropriate channel for handling the complaint. In doing so, they will take into account the complainant’s primary relationship with the University and their relationship to the subject of the complaint. (95) The case manager will also determine whether the complaint is about a staff member who is also a student. If the complaint is about a staff member who is also a student, the investigator will determine whether relevant student policies and procedures or relevant staff policies and procedures are the most appropriate standard for assessing the complaint. (96) If a complaint is lodged by or is about a staff member who is also a student, Human Resources will work collaboratively with the Student Conduct and Investigations Office in resolving the complaint. (97) There are a number of potential outcomes that may result from resolving complaints. These will depend on factors such as: (98) The outcomes are not limited to, but may include: (99) Following the resolution of a complaint lodged by or about a staff member who is also a student, a staff member from Human Resources may refer the matter to the Director, Student Life for further review in accordance with the Student Conduct Management Policy and relevant policies. (100) Should staff raise a serious allegation of unacceptable behaviour (or even misconduct, conflict of interest etc.) the University may have a legal obligation to investigate even if the staff member does not wish to pursue the matter; refer to ‘Legal Issues’ below. (101) If someone is found to have raised a false or deliberately misleading claim against another person they may face disciplinary action. (102) Confidentiality must be adhered to during and after the process of making and resolving complaints. Staff may only discuss the complaint with those legitimately and directly involved in the complaint or in its resolution. (103) This requirement seeks to protect the rights and privacy of all involved and to ensure a comfortable and productive working environment. Should a staff member’s complaint become more widely known, there is the potential for undue embarrassment and workplace tension. In addition, it is less likely the complaint will be successfully resolved. (104) Breaches of confidentiality could result in disciplinary action being taken. (105) Making secret recordings of conversations (on devices such as phones, recorders etc) undermines the confidentiality and integrity of the process of grievance resolution therefore the University strictly prohibits recordings without explicit consent from all parties involved in a conversation. Should consent be obtained, such consent to be recorded in writing and on the recording device at the commencement of the recording. (106) The University can be held legally responsible for acts of discrimination or harassment that occur in the workplace or in connection with a person’s employment. This is known as vicarious liability. (107) The University can be held vicariously liable for discrimination and harassment that occurs in the workplace, or in connection with a person’s employment, including at: (108) This also extends to being liable when computers, phones or tablets are used to harass a person; for example by sending text messages, posting on social media sites or sending emails that have a connection to the workplace. (109) We also note that spreading gossip or rumours may expose staff to a defamation action. (110) Should a serious allegation of unacceptable behaviour be raised, the University may have a legal obligation to investigate even if the staff member does not wish to pursue the matter. (111) Staff who harass, bully or discriminate against others in the workplace are directly liable for their own actions. (112) Some matters may also be considered an offence under criminal law and may (except where reporting is mandatory) be reported to the Police. They include (but are not limited to): (113) The legislation does allow some exceptions in respect of discrimination. For example: (114) The circumstances in which exceptions may apply are set out in the relevant legislation. (115) Reasonable management action, carried out in a fair way, is not bullying (albeit some experiences can be uncomfortable for those involved). Managers have a right to direct the way work is carried out, to monitor the work and give feedback on performance. Examples of reasonable management action may include: (116) A staff member who is a party to a grievance has the right to have a support person present at meetings. If the staff member chooses not to have a support person the process will still continue. (117) A support person can be a friend, family member or a work colleague (this person cannot be a practicing solicitor or barrister), or Union. They are nominated by a staff member to provide support on their behalf, but are not entitled to make representations or act as an advocate. (118) The role of the support person is to provide professional and moral support to the staff concerned. They may also act as a witness or observer to the process. (119) The support person should not disrupt the process, direct the process or otherwise interfere with the meeting. The support person is not there to advocate on behalf of the staff member. (120) Should a support person attempt to intervene, direct the process or advocate on behalf of the staff, they should be warned that this contravenes the role of support person. If the support person persists, the support person may be asked to leave the meeting and the meeting may be terminated and rescheduled, with another support person present. (121) It is not appropriate for meetings to be unreasonably delayed due to the unavailability of a staff member’s support person. If this occurs, the staff member will be advised to nominate another support person. (122) A support person should not have had any involvement in the incident being discussed. (123) If issues of unacceptable workplace behaviour arise in an area of responsibility of a manager, supervisor, leader etc. they should take all reasonable steps to deal with them promptly and to prevent a recurrence of the problem and should deal with complaints of unacceptable workplace behaviour in accordance with the relevant policies/procedures. (124) Managers have the responsibility to: (125) Staff have a responsibility to: (126) Staff have the right to seek assistance from an external body/authority (including their Union) at any stage. For example: (127) There are people and resources available to assist or support staff and provide information, advice or appropriate referrals. Support options may include: (128) This Policy accepts the definitions outlined in related legislation. (129) Further, for the purpose of this Policy and Procedure: (130) This Policy is made under the La Trobe University Act 2009. (131) Refer to the Associated Information page, where you will find a list of the most relevant Australian law relating to this topic. Note that the list of legislation is not comprehensive.Workplace Behaviours Policy
This policy is being updated to reflect the new Enterprise Agreement and may currently contain out of date information. If you have any questions, please lodge an Ask HR ticket.
Section 1 - Key Information
Top of Page
Policy Type and Approval Body
Administrative – Vice-Chancellor
Accountable Executive – Policy
Chief Operating Officer
Responsible Manager – Policy
Executive Director, Human Resources
Review Date
2 August 2026
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Key Decisions
Top of Page
Key decisions/Responsibilities
Role
Reviews the findings and determines the outcome/s of an investigation of a complaint
Executive Director, Human Resources/ or nominee
Section 5 - Policy Statement
Workplace Entitlement
University Commitment
Expected Workplace Behaviour (All Staff)
Breach of Policy
Top of PageSection 6 - Procedures
Part A - Discrimination
Direct Discrimination
Indirect Discrimination
Exceptions
Legal Protections
Part B - Harassment
Sexual Harassment
Racial Harassment
Part C - Bullying
Direct or Indirect Bullying
Intentional or Unintentional Bullying
Part D - Vilification
Part E - Victimisation
Part F - Occupational Violence
Part G - Personal Relationships
Part H - University Functions and Activities
Part I - Alcohol and Drugs
Staff on Call
Part J - Use of Equipment
Part K - Staff Actions – What to Do?
Witnessing Unacceptable Behaviour
Experiencing Unacceptable Behaviour
The Decision to Make a Complaint
Principles of the Complaints Process
Responding to a Complaint
Complaint Process
Process to Lodge a Complaint
Investigating Complaints
Staff Who Are Also Students
Potential Outcomes
No Action
If the initial assessment and/or investigation identifies that the complaint is not substantiated.
Coaching
Informal action through coaching. If the initial assessment and/or investigation identifies that the behaviour is not serious enough to warrant disciplinary action but may find that a restatement of policy and standards expected, further instruction, re-education or training and coaching the staff member is appropriate.
Restatement of Expected Behaviours
If the staff member is aware of behaviour expectations but has not followed correct procedures and/or behaviour standards, a restatement of expected behaviours will be issued and consequences of repeated instances of such behaviour will be advised.
Disciplinary Action
If the staff member commits a serious breach of policy/procedure, the University can issue a formal censure or counselling in conjunction with a written warning; withhold an increment, demotion, transfer to another position with pay appropriate to the position; suspension with or without pay and termination of employment.
Termination of Employment
Means termination of employment at the initiative of the University in accordance with relevant clauses of the Enterprise Agreement.
Obligation to Act and Investigations
Part L - Legal Issues
False, Malicious and Vexatious Claims
Staff Confidentiality
Recording Conversations
Legal Obligations
Obligation to Act
Individual Liability
However, if the University cannot demonstrate that they have taken ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent the discrimination or harassment from occurring, then both the individual and the University can be jointly liable for the behaviour.Referral to Police
Exceptions
Part M - Performance Management
Part N - Support Person
Who May Be a Support Person
The Role of the Support Person
Part O - Responsibility
Part P - Assistance
External Assistance
Other Assistance
Top of PageSection 7 - Definitions
Top of Page
Section 8 - Authority and Associated Information